Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- From: Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:52:16 -0700
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:39:21 -0000, "Phil Stanton"
<phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The way I look at it is this: if the data is REALLY separate, I would
not mind multiple back-ends. That seems to be the case in your
situation. But if you had told me your Sailing Clubs are all owned by
one company, which would sometimes want to run reports across the
whole enterprise, or send out a mailing that should not have dups (and
people can be member of several clubs), or lower all prices by 5%, you
can see where multiple back-ends would quickly become unmanageable
whereas an integrated one would be soo nice.
Also, the OP hinted at writing a union query to get the records for
Removals1, Removals2, Removals3 and Removals4, and then later come
back and add a new Removals5 to the query. That's where I say "really
bad idea".
-Tom.
Hate to disagree with an expert, but I run 4 or 5 back end DBs with the same.
front end. Largely different sailing Clubs, so members, boats and moorings
and parking spaces used, but also use the same front end for friends, and
Rotary Club. Each DB has it's own menu so that irrelevent forms and reports
don't appear. All DBs have identical sets of tables and relationships, but
of course say the Rotary Club tables have no records in the boat and spaces
table. I have a form which you use to select which set of data you want,
then loop through all the tables to detach them from 1 back end database
then loop through all the tables to attach them for the new front end
database.
Works a treat.
Phil
"Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smddl31k8to7v9eqeh5rhlb5ncrfbo4ds1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 06:14:49 -0800 (PST), karenjfrancis@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
This is a really bad idea. Rather you consolidate into one database,
that can handle multiple Projects.
-Tom.
I have 4 Access databases, all with the same data model but different
data. I want to build a front end that brings all of the data in the
4 databases together into one.
Assuming my table of interest is called Removals, if I create linked
tables I end up with Removals1, Removals2, Removals3 and Removals4. I
could easily write a query to base a form or report upon to
concatenate all of these tables' data into one view. However, the
users take an empty database to use as a template for when a new
project is released so the view needs to be able to compensate for the
sudden addition of Removals5 and create a linked table for it.
Is this possible?
Regards
Karen
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- From: Phil Stanton
- Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- References:
- Merging Data Dynamically
- From: karenjfrancis
- Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- From: Tom van Stiphout
- Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- From: Phil Stanton
- Merging Data Dynamically
- Prev by Date: Re: Send/recieve email using Outlook Express?
- Next by Date: Re: Access 2007: exporting queries doesn't work
- Previous by thread: Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- Next by thread: Re: Merging Data Dynamically
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|