Re: Access 2003 and SQL Server 2000 record locks (long)



On Nov 29, 4:15 pm, jsac...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 29, 3:11 pm, Rich P <rpng...@xxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi Jim,

I use the standard datagridview that comes with VS2005. Here is the
catch though, VS2005 works best with a 2.8 gig processor or higher and
at least 2 gigs of memory. I have had hardware issues at my place for
people that are still using 1.8 gig processors and 1 gig of mem. The
memory at 1 gig isn't actually that bad (if they aren't loading hundreds
of thousands of records), but the 1.8 gig processor does hurt a little
bit. But if you are going to load 200,000 records into a table -
remember that in .Net it is all in memory. So 2 gigs definitley better
than 1 gig.

.Net is fairly resource intensive, but if your hardware has enough
horsepower, you won't notice it (big IF -- I know).

Rich

*** Sent via Developersdexhttp://www.developersdex.com***

Thanks Rich, now it's off to the store for some training material on
VS.NET 2005!

Jim

Great!

Have you researched this carefully?

I have an ASP file that shows twenty records. It appears
instantaneously.
I have an ASPX file on the same site that shows the same records. It
appears in five to ten seconds.

Now it's quite possible that I haven't optimized my ADO.Net and ASPX
to the extent I've optimized my ADO and ASP. I've been using the first
for two years or so and the last for six or seven years.
Then again I have been programming for more than twenty years so it's
always possible that I have optimized them both.



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Access 2003 and SQL Server 2000 record locks (long)
    ... at least 2 gigs of memory. ... people that are still using 1.8 gig processors and 1 gig of mem. ... but the 1.8 gig processor does hurt a little ... but if your hardware has enough ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Access 2003 and SQL Server 2000 record locks (long)
    ... at least 2 gigs of memory. ... people that are still using 1.8 gig processors and 1 gig of mem. ... but the 1.8 gig processor does hurt a little ... but if your hardware has enough ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Can XP cope with 2gb of RAM
    ... it steals the top gig for itself. ... You're confusing physical RAM with the virtual memory space ... A mobo, and Windoze, can ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: help with ram question
    ... I've just installed a fc5 machine. ... Anyway, he already had 1 gig of memory in the machine, but when we put ... You didn't say where the boot fails. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Is Visio 2003 compiled to take advantage of the /3 GB switch?
    ... GHZ, 3 Gig Ram). ... windows xp professional x64 to see if machine responsiveness while handling ... "Virtual Memory Space in 32-bit Windows ... Edition each have a full 4 GB of virtual memory space. ...
    (microsoft.public.visio.general)