Re: Is UserLevel Security Really Necessary?
- From: Nicolas Noakes <annesville@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jun 2007 12:09:53 GMT
@Larry [snip]
On the other hand, the server DBs have better security. MS SQL Server
is, IMNSHO, about the easiest to learn and administer, but has an
initial cost plus a license is required for each user. There are
open-source databases, e.g., MySQL and PostgreSQL, which do not have
the initial or per-user charge, but for which you may need to contract
"services" for helping you solve problems, etc., and they are not as
easy to learn and administer.
[/snip]
Please note that you can get Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition
as a free download from Microsoft. SQL Server Management Studio Express
Edition is also free. Using SQL Server as the data store is not
difficult, and definitely much more secure. You could, for instance,
create a stored procedure in MSSQL to append a new log entry and give
the security site user access to that ONLY.
Nic
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
.
- References:
- Re: Is UserLevel Security Really Necessary?
- From: Larry Linson
- Re: Is UserLevel Security Really Necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Add records in multi-user environment
- Next by Date: A2K: possibilities of adding snazzy search functions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is UserLevel Security Really Necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Is UserLevel Security Really Necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|