Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: Randy Harris <randy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:21:44 GMT
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:00:29 -0400, MLH <CRCI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
C:\Docs\TitleWork>ping piedmonttriadtowing.dyndns.org
Pinging piedmonttriadtowing.dyndns.org [70.60.253.195] with 32 bytes
of data:
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=239
Ping statistics for 70.60.253.195:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 324ms, Average = 121ms
C:\Docs\TitleWork>
Q: Should one expect shorter ping times pinging the IP
address directly as opposed to traveling through dyndns?
No. The ping will travel the same route. The only difference is that
you won't have to resolve the address before pinging.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randy Harris
tech at promail dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: MLH
- Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- References:
- O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: MLH
- O.T. ==> PING discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Page count in group
- Next by Date: Re: Access 2000 needs to be repaired EVERY day
- Previous by thread: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- Next by thread: Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
