O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: MLH <CRCI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:00:29 -0400
C:\Docs\TitleWork>ping piedmonttriadtowing.dyndns.org
Pinging piedmonttriadtowing.dyndns.org [70.60.253.195] with 32 bytes
of data:
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=239
Reply from 70.60.253.195: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=239
Ping statistics for 70.60.253.195:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 324ms, Average = 121ms
C:\Docs\TitleWork>
Q: Should one expect shorter ping times pinging the IP
address directly as opposed to traveling through dyndns?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: ManningFan
- Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- From: Randy Harris
- Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: "No Current Record" question
- Next by Date: Re: Page count in group
- Previous by thread: Page count in group
- Next by thread: Re: O.T. ==> PING discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|