Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- From: "David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:04:16 -0500
w_a_n_n_a_l_l_ -@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:FAgfg.2606$VE1.1478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Sounds like the only option that will work is to set a reference
to the MDE in your live project, and then wait until last user is
out to replace that MDE.
I don't know if that is what is meant or not. That would only be a
problem if you're sharing the library, and, well, why in the world
would anyone in his right mind do that?
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- From: Rick Wannall
- Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- References:
- My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- From: Mathieu Trentesaux
- Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- From: david epsom dot com dot au
- Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- From: w_a_n_n_a_l_l_ -
- My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- Prev by Date: Re: Access SQL
- Next by Date: Re: Users Log in issue
- Previous by thread: Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- Next by thread: Re: My ritual question for each new version of Access since 2000
- Index(es):