Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- From: "Rick Wannall" <wannall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:14:18 GMT
Based on the little I know about the mechanics of the data-gathering and
report-formatting phases, I would bet that the subreport approach would have
to be faster. If you can get the data you want by using links between
tables, and if you properly index those tables (all have primary keys, and
the fields in other tables that contain those values as foreign keys are
indexed as well), then the data can be gathered as intelligently as the JET
engine is capable of getting it. This has to beat repeated calls to the
DLookup function during the data gathering phase.
If you do some detailed testing, I for one would be very interested in your
results.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- From: Ron
- Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- References:
- Subreport or DLookup?
- From: Ron
- Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- From: Larry Linson
- Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- From: Rick Wannall
- Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- From: Ron
- Subreport or DLookup?
- Prev by Date: Re: Operation Must Use An Updateable Query!? - NOT Permissions - CrossTab!!??
- Next by Date: Re: Users Log in issue
- Previous by thread: Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- Next by thread: Re: Subreport or DLookup?
- Index(es):