Re: How will Access Survive



Good question huh? -:). I agree a lot with Allen Browne and others on
good points. I think Access is becoming more robust for programmers
also. Because I do most of the development myself I use wizard,
add-ins, etc to make my job a lot easier. Most companies may start to
build application with Access but will still rely on programmers to
enhance or finish the project. Access is light weight portable and not
least affordable for most companies. Developing Access Pages is going
to be cutting edge working with primary interop assemblies (PIAs) that
contain the official description of the most commonly used., InfoPath
and other office products. I find that Access Pages don't have the
same versatility as static form, but hopefully from the same
environment access pages can be created with little bit more flex. I
seen snapshot of what Microsoft has shown of Access 2007, and
demonstration of what can be create through couple of the wizard. I
think Access will allow its developers to create application they only
thought of before. I am going to be died hard co-visionary of Access.
-:)

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Up to date MFC Book
    ... I hardly ever used wizard in MFC and it was fine. ... wizard in .Net only helps in doing WinForms kind of work. ... There are just design issues which are identical to what you had to deal ... it was predicted that programmers would die out as there would be no need for them. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Up to date MFC Book
    ... I dont buy this at all. ... Developing classes which are non WinForm (and thats a majority for a ... I use the wizard if I need it or it makes life easy. ... Good programmers write good programs, ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: The wizard was political
    ... the wizard available to classic VB programmers ... >auspiciously to allow them almost seamless conversion to VB.Net is ... It's just there so that Microsoft can ... Only programmers realize that 'support' means not frigging the OS so ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: Does software-engineering focus on the wrong subject?
    ... >programmers are incapable of becoming much better? ... mystery. ... I've been trying to decode this very process for ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities
    ... >Colonel Forbin wrote: ... >>were more robust. ... >relative priority of security vs. other considerations. ... It seems that, in some ways, the programmers out there were only ...
    (sci.crypt)