Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: salad <oil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:09:54 GMT
I'm curious about your opinion on setting relationships.
When I designed my first app in Access I'd go to Tools/Relationships and set the relationships. Over time I'd go into the window and see relationship spaghetti....tables/queries all overthe place with lots of relationship lines between here and there.
After that first app I didn't do relationships. If I had a query, I defined the relationship. Many of the times when I create a new query and add 2 tables together it creates the correct relationship between the two tables. I believe this is due to using a foreign key with the same name. I cared not about cascading deletes or cascading updates or the type of relationship so the relationships window is clean of tables.
And if I need to, I'll create a query on the fly via code. Again, I set the relationships. I know these queries aren't compiled for optimacy like a querydef but operate well.
My apps don't appear to suffer from no relationships. Speeds very acceptable, the results the same. So is setting relationships just more overhead in creating an app and unnecessary...or do you believe the app should have all relationships defined?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: '69 Camaro
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: Tom van Stiphout
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: rkc
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: TIMMY!
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: pietlinden
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- From: Lyle Fairfield
- Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- Prev by Date: Re: Refresh on Close
- Next by Date: Re: avoid printing the last page on purpose
- Previous by thread: Restrict Other Fields from Getting Filtered
- Next by thread: Re: Relationships. Does anyone use them?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|