Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- From: Lyle Fairfield <lylefairfield@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:23:43 GMT
"Arno R" <arraNOcomSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:4446a28e$0$2021$ba620dc5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"Trevor Best" <googlegroups@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:44469bec$0$8336$da0feed9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Have you tried a /decompile ?
In my original post I said:
I tried repair-compact, decompile and the like. Still the same.
Also: I just made a backup of the mdb
I deleted all objects in my original mdb.
I compacted the mdb and imported all the objects from the backup
again. (This had to do with the security-settings for new objects that
I wanted to keep this way)
But: Still the same problem !!
I created a new mdb, and adjusted the security-settings for all new
objects for all users and groups. Imported all the objects from the
same backup and now the zip is 2257 kb. OK ! Still need to adjust some
security-settings for a few special queries and so but problem is
solved.
Still stunned! What 'special' setting did I trigger in the database?
Arno R
I think you said you had done the saveastext loadfromtext thing on all
your objects. Your db will be as small as possible now because there are
zero extraneous objects/code in it and it is uncompiled. When it is
compiled, it will get bigger.
Zipping looks for similar strings and notes their location. If a db is
encrytped it's unlikely there are any similar recognizable string
patterns (else the encryption would be tres easy to break). So you get no
compaction, plus you get the zip overhead; hence a larger db. I never use
security by my memory tells me that when Access security is applied,
encryption occurs. I could be way wrong there, but if no encryption then
what good is the security?
ramble ramble .... snore snore
--
Lyle Fairfield
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- From: Arno R
- Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- References:
- mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- From: Arno R
- Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- From: Trevor Best
- Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- From: Arno R
- mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- Prev by Date: Re: Fields not required
- Next by Date: Re: Email automation [Me!Field]
- Previous by thread: Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- Next by thread: Re: mdb-size and zip-size (zip hardly smaller)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|