Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: "(PeteCresswell)" <x@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 10:10:27 -0400
Per David W. Fenton:
That is no different than with a file server or a web server, so I
just don't see the point in bringing it up as an issue. A Terminal
Server is going to be as reliable as any Windows server.
My concern would be that on the troubleshooting groups radar, the terminal
server might look different: only a few people affected, maybe not covered by
whatever monitoring setup they have, possibly not understood by the
rank-and-file.
--
PeteCresswell
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- References:
- Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: (PeteCresswell)
- Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: (PeteCresswell)
- Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- From: David W. Fenton
- Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- Prev by Date: Re: Access v dot net
- Next by Date: Re: Query with user-defined function doesn't appear to work.
- Previous by thread: Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- Next by thread: Re: Philly-To-London via Intranet?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|