Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Bri <not@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:31:37 GMT
Mark wrote:
Don't write off Irfanview. Unlike PSP it is not an image editor.
But it does have very good features for batch processing, and that
is what I use it for.
I didn't notice that it had batch processing, I'll have to look at it again. I've been using the batch processing in XNview and hope to be able to use his SDK to automate the creation of new thumbnails.
Is this peculiar to the OLE Object field, or would the Memo field
exhibit the same problem? Assuming that a binary stream can be
stored in a memo field, that might be a suitable way to store a small
(<65k) jpeg thumbnail.
I think that Bob has done a better job of answering this than I could have. I guess the key is whether you plan to dispay the thumbnail (I do) or not. If you do, then you get the overhead. Larry Linson has chimed in on a lot of the threads that discuss images in Access and has a webpage that discribes the three major approaches to do it and what the benifits of each are. Here is the link:
http://members.tripod.com/accdevel/imaging.htm
Unfortunately, database size will grow substantially if images are
stored in the database. It is definitely a tradeoff. IMHO it may be
workable if only small renditions are stored in the database.
Of course you will still have quite a bit of work to do if you lose
your links to the external full-resolution images, but at least you
will have the db-based thumbnails to guide you in restoring the
links.
I proposed a checksum-based method to help solidify the links
to the external images. This would entail generating a unique
checksum value for each full-resolution image, and storing that
value in the database record. If the external links were lost,
the checksums could make it possible to programmatically
re-establish the external links by re-generating checksums
for the external images and matching them to the checksums
in the database. Obviously this is not foolproof, but it could
be quite helpful in disaster recovery.
Like Bob, I am unsure of what you are trying to accomplish here? Do you plan to move the images around to different folders behind the DBs back? And hope that it will be able to find them again?
--
Bri
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Mark
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- References:
- Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Mark
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Anthony England
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Mark
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Bri
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Mark
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Bri
- Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- From: Mark
- Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- Prev by Date: Looking up redundant occurences
- Next by Date: Grouping labels
- Previous by thread: Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- Next by thread: Re: Error with AppendChunk() and MEMO field
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|