Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- From: "David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:21:35 -0600
google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:1139625226.566539.156630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"I know nothing about this latter capability. Where are you
getting that information from?"
See my link in the same post. It was something Joan Wild stated,
but I've seen it elsewhere too. I just don't know how to do it,
as I thought a workgroup file only kept track of users/groups, not
pemissions.
The URL did not take me to the article in question, but to the
thread. I didn't feel like wading through it to find out what you
were talking about.
I've done so now, and see no basis for Joan's comment. I have a lot
of respect for Joan's expertise, but I have no idea how to set up an
MDW file in a way that prohibits the creation of new databases.
Indeed, my understanding of Jet security (perhaps imperfect) would
lead me to believe that it's not possible, as the MDW includes only
the account and group information, and none of the actual
permissions, which are all stored in particular MDB files. If the
user creates a new MDB (which cannot be prevented in an MDW), then
they are the owner of it and have full permission on all of its
objects.
All that said, I think you're off on a red herring, in any case. The
ability to create a new database does not give someone the ability
to import data they've got no permissions on. They could perhaps
link to those tables, but still not be able to see anything, unless
they are using software to crack Jet user-level security. If you're
willing to accept that (which I consider reasonable, as any security
system is crackable by someone with the interest and the time), then
I think you should stop worrying about this side issue.
Now, of course, if someone can explain how Joan's comment is
correct, then that's a different issue entirely.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- From: Bri
- Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- From: google
- Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- From: google
- Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- Prev by Date: Re: Transactions in Access 2000
- Next by Date: Re: Updating checkboxes No more Jitters!!
- Previous by thread: Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- Next by thread: Re: RWOP queries for back-end secuirty: easy/hard? slow/fast?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading