Re: How to stop library mde being reused
- From: "Terry Kreft" <terry.kreft@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:26:26 -0000
Hmm, yes, I spoted ion a later posting that mdb files are being distributed.
There probably isn't a lot to be done in stopping this happening in that
case, except making the library so specific to the application that it
ceases to be a generic library, rather as you suggest elsewhere in this
thread.
--
Terry Kreft
"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97339B9EE149f99a49ed1d0c49c5bbb2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Terry Kreft" <terry.kreft@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:OFidnUYm9d4Q4DTeSa8jmw@xxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> I'm taking it that your distributed apps are compiled to MDEs as
>> well as your library database
>
> Yes, but he already said that the client has the source code MDB and
> that the developer probably took a copy of that to figure out how to
> use his library. Using a GUID or any other form of validation simply
> won't work, as so soon as you can figure out what *does* work, you
> can write something to pass something valid to the MDE.
>
> I don't think there's any technical solution to this problem.
>
> There are only ethical/legal solutions.
>
> The client should fire the other developer if she won't stop
> stealing from the client's other developers.
>
> --
> David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
> usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Erl
- Next by Date: Re: Erl
- Previous by thread: Problems while making MDE
- Next by thread: Best solution? (too few parameters. Expected 1.)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|