Re: MS Access forum
- From: "David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:23:42 -0600
"Randy Harris" <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:wPnof.41459$D13.11608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> "Rob Oldfield" <blah@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:43a20626$0$29574$da0feed9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Just agreeing with fred, but would like to add, to dbNovice, that
>> this thread may well degenerate into another flamefest. If so,
>> it has nothing
> to
>> do with you. It's just an ongoing battle between PC Data***
>> and
> reality.
>>
>
>
> I was hoping that might be avoided, that's why I did not respond
> to the post from the troll.
If you two didn't discuss the subject, those of us who have Steve
killfiled wouldn't know about it at all.
Hint, hint.
You can't put out a fire by pouring gasoline on it.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MS Access forum
- From: Rob Oldfield
- Re: MS Access forum
- References:
- MS Access forum
- From: dBNovice
- Re: MS Access forum
- From: fredg
- Re: MS Access forum
- From: Rob Oldfield
- Re: MS Access forum
- From: Randy Harris
- MS Access forum
- Prev by Date: Re: Outdated help (feat. Access '97 and VB4)
- Next by Date: Re: MS Access forum
- Previous by thread: Re: MS Access forum
- Next by thread: Re: MS Access forum
- Index(es):
Loading