Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: rkc <rkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:18:39 GMT
David W. Fenton wrote:
rkc <rkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:KcrSe.54251$EX.21809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
David W. Fenton wrote:
My rule: Never depend on bookmarks for anything where you can use
actual data to do so. Use bookmarks only for circumstances where
you *can't* use data.
What could possibly cause just the bookmark property to fail in a recordset opened as a snapshot?
You're asking the wrong question. I don't know that there are any
such conditions that lead to failure, but I don't know that there
are not. What I do know is that navigating by PK will *never* fail
if the recordset itself remains valid.
Why use something that is a black box about which I know very little
when there's a guaranteed method that doesn't have any blackbox
aspects to it?
I don't see why you view the FindFirst method as any less of a blackbox. The bookmark property is available for the exact purpose of flagging and returning to a specific record in a recordset. Saying that you can do the same in a more round about way doesn't make it mysterious or unreliable.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- References:
- Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: Tim Marshall
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: rkc
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: rkc
- Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- From: David W. Fenton
- Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- Prev by Date: Re: Evaluating Complex Recordset Field Statements
- Next by Date: Re: How do I refer to a series on an MSgraph in access?
- Previous by thread: Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- Next by thread: Re: Effects on RST in Calling Proc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|