Re: How many subforms can I have in Access 97?

On 28 Jul 2005 04:42:03 -0500, sitting@ease (polite person) wrote:

>On 28 Jul 2005 02:14:24 -0700, "lylefair" <lylefair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>.....
>>
>>It's been quite a long time since I have bothered with an Access
>>subform.
>>
>interesting, as it is the one thing which is far easier to do in Access than in anything
>else. .
>(I did say "far")
>
though maybe you mean that you still use subforms, but roll-your-own ones rather
than Access ones.

.