Re: [Info-ingres] Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- From: martin.bowes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:21:46 +0100
Hi Vdohnal,
This could be bug 103157.
Do a trace point qs505, see if it shows any sign of LRU objects
destroyed = non-zero. If it's always zero then you may have this bug.
Martin Bowes
Hello,
we had similar problems on Solaris/Ingres 2.6 and now we have it back
again on Linux 64bit/Ingres 2006. And we have about 150 concurrent
users.
Our problem is in QSF memory. If the QSF memory is filled up more than
30%, everything goes very slowly. But unix has idle over 80%. And our
workaround is run trace point qs506 every few hours.
On Solaris two times during 2 years trace point qs506 crashed DBMS
server and our production db was inconsistent.
_______________________________________________
Info-ingres mailing list
Info-ingres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.cariboulake.com/mailman/listinfo.py/info-ingres
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- From: vdohnal
- Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- References:
- Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- From: Nabil
- Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- From: vdohnal
- Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- Prev by Date: Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- Next by Date: Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- Previous by thread: Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- Next by thread: Re: Mutex: ULM Pool (QEF)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|