Re: Tablespace size
- From: Ian Michael Gumby <im_gumby@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:45:13 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 20, 5:44 am, "Neil Truby" <neil.tr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And that, although it's fairly simple for an Informix God such as myself to
workaround, the same is not necessarily true of others; that having to use
fragmentation not for its intended purpose but to get around an increasingly
wearisome product limitation is not consistent with the "Low Maintenance"
marketing message; and that it really needs to be addressed.
So, Bollocks to you and your uninformed opinion! (Which of course though I
fully respect as equally valid to mine).
Neil,
When you talk about a 'set it and forget it' database, how large are
you really talking about?
I mean lets take an example... a POS system sitting in a Wally*Mart.
You only have so many SKU items.
You have only so many transactions, which you can offload to corporate
past 120 days if you like and then purge them from the system.
(For RMAs you would want to track it in both the same store or either
query the other store (peer to peer) or back to HQ.)
So in the store, IDS works great because you're not really going to
have to deal with a 16GB table space limit.
While I chose a POS system, you can also choose an embedded
application. Order entry for a mom & pop shop. Warehouse Distribution.
Lots of applications don't even touch that limit.
For those that do, we have guys like you and Art. ;-)
.
- References:
- Tablespace size
- From: Neil Truby
- Re: Tablespace size
- From: Obnoxio The Clown
- Re: Tablespace size
- From: Neil Truby
- Re: Tablespace size
- From: Obnoxio The Clown
- Re: Tablespace size
- From: Neil Truby
- Tablespace size
- Prev by Date: Re: Tablespace size
- Next by Date: Anybody using 11.5 and NetBeans 6.5?
- Previous by thread: Re: Tablespace size
- Next by thread: Re: Tablespace size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|