Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
- From: DA Morgan <damorgan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:38:14 -0700
Carsten Haese wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:41 -0700, DA Morgan wrote:Personally, and again speaking from an Oracle perspective, I can't
think of any application I would ever want to develop that wouldn't
involve more than 5 concurrent sessions and working replication.
During development?
Yes during development. Do you build multi-use applications and then
just throw them over the cubicle wall?
Of course you'd want more than 5 concurrent sessions and replication in
production, but I find it hard to believe that you'd need that during
development.
Again, speaking from my perspective, we have a free tool we download
from an Oracle employee SwingBench (http://www.dominicgiles.com).
With it we stress test in development by throwing workloads against
our code: Dialing in multiple connections and multiple numbers and
types of transactions. For me to test with hundreds of connections is
not unusual ... it is the norm. Even when I run a RAC class in the lab
we commonly dial in hundreds of connections per server to demonstrate
load balancing and failover.
I can't believe that you have a lesser burden to meet.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(replace x with u to respond)
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
- Next by Date: Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
- Next by thread: Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|