Re: At a loss with date entry in FMPA 9 / XP
- From: "Christoph Bouthillier" <post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 23:40:26 +0100
"Ursus" <ursus.kirk@xxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:47503f72$0$54356$dbd4b001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Christoph Bouthillier" <post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:d92e0$475027a4$59dc4456$18220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FMPA 902, Dutch Win XP
Dear Listeners:
Date fields turn out to be almost totally unusable in the above
combination:
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
Christoph Bouthillier
p o s t <<a t>> oh-no-spam t e k s t o t a a l << d o t >> c o m
Forget the oh-no-spam
Same set-up here. FMPA 9 dutch on XP
Recreated your setup, found no problems
If you want I could send a fresh copy of the sample I made.
Keep well, Ursus
Hello Ursus.
Have been playing around with it some more, probleem seems to be gone
(hopefully not for the moment), still can't find any reason for the varying
behaviour.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
Christoph Bouthillier
p o s t <<a t>> oh-no-spam t e k s t o t a a l << d o t >> c o m
Forget the oh-no-spam
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: At a loss with date entry in FMPA 9 / XP
- From: Ursus
- Re: At a loss with date entry in FMPA 9 / XP
- Prev by Date: FM Pro 6: lost many records.
- Next by Date: field behavior after conversion form 6 to 9 - video permitted?
- Previous by thread: Re: At a loss with date entry in FMPA 9 / XP
- Next by thread: Re: At a loss with date entry in FMPA 9 / XP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
