Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: clk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Christoph Kaufmann)
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:48:21 +0200
Helpful Harry <helpful_harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The reason we now have to put up with the idiotic "activation" nonsense[snip]
is because greedy people
were illegally installing it anywhere
and everywhere. :o( There is no excuse for piracy, it's simply sheer
laziness and greediness.
Fair enough. OTOH, Filemaker's mother company Apple sold me a computer
with lousy disk drives. The CD drive died a few months after I'd bought
the iMac, the HDD died two years after the purchase with FMP 8 Advanced
installed on it.
If it had been FMP 9, I'd have to deactivate the licence in order to
install the product on the new disk. Should I fail to do that - which is
rather likely since the HDD is dead - I'd have to purchase a new
licence.
Same problem if the computers gets stolen. I tried the FMP FAQ on that
point. It seems that the author has been instructed to mock the readers.
--
http://clk.ch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: Howard Schlossberg
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- References:
- Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: Will
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: TKnTexas
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: Helpful Harry
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: Will
- Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- From: Helpful Harry
- Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- Prev by Date: Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.0
- Next by Date: interest calculation
- Previous by thread: Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- Next by thread: Re: Two install limit on Filemaker 9.5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|