Re: Ideal Developer Computer

In article <1175963989.941580.73880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Eric" <ggroups1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am a new FileMaker Developer, working with version 8.5, and I need
to invest in a new computer. This machine will be used primarily for
*designing* databases. It will not be used for hosting, etc.

I understand the minimum requirements...

http://filemaker.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/filemaker.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_
faqid=6036

... but I'd like to understand what components I should pay attention
to in order maximize FileMaker's performance. For example, when I
click and drag a set of fields in design view, I want it to happen in
real time. The computer I'm currently using has a delay of a few
seconds when I do this common task.

While a Mac is on my wish list, I am limited to buying a Windows
machine. That said, what components are most important for me to
invest in, i.e., processor, RAM, hard drive? What would be the ideal
computer for a FM 8.5 developer? What does the dream machine look
like?

Why be "limited"?? Yes, the Mac tends to LOOK a bit more expensive to
buy, although if you price an equivalent specced Windows PC you often
find there's no real difference. The Mac tends to be a much more stable
machine, with NO virus problems and a tendency to last a longer useful
life, it is much cheaper in the long run. With the new Intel-based Macs
you can also use Boot Camp or Parallels to run Windows for testing your
databases on the "Dark Side" (just keep the Windows side off the
Internet to still be free of nasties on your Windows side), giving you
both systems on one computer. Most "switchers" never go back again.
:o)

The Mac is probably THE best developer system you can buy.

"Dream machine" - try an 8-core Mac Pro with dual 30" Cinema Displays,
maxed out RAM and hard drives. And don't forget the colour A3 laser
printer for printing out your database's user manuals. An easy buy at
around US$10,000. ;o)

Helpful Harry
Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: designing problem
    ... I have a little designing problem. ... imagine you would program word for windows and word for mac. ... that you have many different programmversions ... ...
    (comp.databases)
  • Re: Using Access 2003 & 2007 databases
    ... is there any better to run Access on Windows on top of Mac OS? ... > databases in use. ... use VirtualPC) ... ...
    (comp.databases.filemaker)
  • designing problem
    ... I have a little designing problem. ... imagine you would program word for windows and word for mac. ... that you have many different programmversions ... ...
    (comp.databases)
  • 15 reasons Macs are still better than Windows PCs
    ... With Windows 7 coming up, it's time to yet again ponder on whether ... I long ago stopped actively seeking out Mac vs PC discussions (partly ... Apple uses good quality parts. ... problem lies from those three apps. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple Notebook
    ... die gerne mit Unix Befehlen arbeiten und sich freuen, ... mich stören weder UNIX-Befehle (neben Mac OS X benutze ich selbst z.B. u.A. auch HP-UX, UNIX ist für mich also kein Fremder) noch Leute, die mit ihrem Mac zufrieden sind. ... Mich stört auch nicht, dass Windows mit Ausnahme von Windows Server 2003 R2 keine UNIX-Befehle kann, genauer gesagt geht mir das ziemlich am Allerwertesten vorbei, einfach weil der Bedarf nicht vorhanden ist. ... Und das nicht nur deswegen, weil Apple schlichtweg keinen professionellen Support anbietet, sondern weil die Masse der wichtigen Anwendungen eben nicht unter Mac OS X läuft, sondern unter Windows oder allenfalls noch Linux. ...
    (de.comp.sys.notebooks)