Re: Embedding images - File Size
- From: Albert <asteg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:02:16 GMT
In article <slrnedmlej.qmq.t-use@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Martin Trautmann <t-use@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What's your packup strategy for your 3GB files? one DVD each?
Well, my database as it stands at the moment is about half a gig -- the
figures in my example is what I'm projecting to be likely growth over
the next couple years.
I back up onto a 20 gig external hard drive.
At any rate, I find Bill's warning about the insidious effect that a
single corrupted image spoiling the entire collection of images pretty
nauseating. I guess it would be more prudent to use refs to the images
stored in a folder.
....it's just that it's yet another folder system I have to set up and
maintain. I have folders containing around 50 images from each film set
up in a folder system, and since I'm only using three images for each
film in the database, I think it would make sense to copy those images
into a folder set up for this Database -- I don't want to have to think
about the database every time I decide to move a folder on my hard
drive, which I do frequently for various reasons.
It would just be so nice to have the database be a single file -- now
that Tables replaced Related files things seemed so tidy...
Albert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Embedding images - File Size
- From: Bill Marriott
- Re: Embedding images - File Size
- References:
- Embedding images - File Size
- From: Albert
- Embedding images - File Size
- Prev by Date: Re: Inventory Starter
- Next by Date: Re: Adding year to date while importing
- Previous by thread: Re: Embedding images - File Size
- Next by thread: Re: Embedding images - File Size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|