Re: no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- From: Axel Potthoff <apn51@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:19 +0100
Hi,
Leonard wrote:
Gil is correct. If any of the applications access the same data set
or database they should all be the same version.
All the databases are version 7 due to history.
But one question: Do you go to your customer an tell him to upgrade 9
workstations to version 9 because of one new system? Are they willing to
pay for it? For the licenses, for the installation, the configuration and
(if you act consequently) converting the databases to the latest version?
We are out of the job, when we offer somenthing like that to our customers.
I accept, that Pervasive turns the back to version 5 databases when stepping
to version 9. But I don't accept updates to every workstation every year.
An one other question:
Isn't it possible to adjust an local Pervasive engine as a LOCAL WORKSTATION
ENGINE?
* no workgroup functions
* no gateway functions
* no remote requests
* no acception of remote requests
* working only local
This worked well with Version 6 (or was it 7?), when workSTATION engines
were availiable!
Because of changing our applications from native btrieve calls to SQL, we
think of changing to other database engines.
Axel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- From: Axel Potthoff
- Re: no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- From: nelsonsoft
- Re: no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- From: Leonard
- no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- Prev by Date: Re: Status 11
- Next by Date: Re: Strang behavior of Backup-Agent 1.0
- Previous by thread: Re: no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- Next by thread: Re: no server engine, only local workstation engines, Status 116
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|