Re: Software suggestions
- From: "Jean-Francois Puget (pu...@xxxxxxx)" <puget@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:15:00 -0700
On Jun 14, 2:12 pm, A.L. <f...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:00:30 -0700, "Jean-Francois Puget
(p...@xxxxxxx)" <p...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:43 pm, A.L. <f...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree that it would have little sense to implement solver
internals in Java (or even in C++ that has ist own overhead),
??
Yes, you can write slow C++ programs, but you can alos write programs
that have exactly the same performance as a C program.
So, what is the overhead you're speaking about?
Yes, you can write C program in C++. I am talking about various "OO
Numerics" that slow down computtaions substantially.
A.L.
I said that you can write C++ code as efficient as C code. I did not
say that you can write C code in C++ (which is also true). You can
use objects as data structure and still have efficient algorithms.
I don't know what you call OO Numerics. Can you explain?
JF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: A . L .
- Re: Software suggestions
- References:
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: trosky99@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: Paul A. Rubin
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: cmj917
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: Paul A. Rubin
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: puget@xxxxxxx
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: puget@xxxxxxx
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: Paul A. Rubin
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: A . L .
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: Jean-Francois Puget (pu...@xxxxxxx)
- Re: Software suggestions
- From: A . L .
- Re: Software suggestions
- Prev by Date: Re: Software suggestions
- Next by Date: Re: Software suggestions
- Previous by thread: Re: Software suggestions
- Next by thread: Re: Software suggestions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|