Re: Suggest any topic..
- From: Jim Leonard <MobyGamer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:49:15 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 1, 8:58 pm, Sportman <sport...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I see something unfair I try to balance the case
To paraphrase Brian Dunning, there are not "two sides" to mathematics.
There is no "presenting both sides of an issue". Math is not
philosophy or opinion. Math consists of what we've learned so far. And
one thing that we've learned so far, is that you can't fit 16 pigeons
into 15 holes.
I’m not related with any
inventor or invention in this field but feel it unfair they are not
taken serious while the research I did, speak often more for them then
against them.
They're not taken seriously for a reason -- they're impossible. Just
because you don't understand the math involved does not mean they
"might have been on to something".
Let take as Adam Clark as example and then only the claim he made that
the Patent records issued by the United States Patent and Trademark
Office where inaccurate and incomplete and that the US States
Government or at least it’s Patent & Trademark Office refused to
publish as required at law the full invention of Mr. Clarks work.
The whole point of patenting something is to make it as public as
possible so that you can claim a monopoly on it for the nest 25
years. If there are materials missing from the patent, it is the
fault of Clark for not providing them. And it makes no sense that he
would not provide them because not doing so renders his patent, and
monopoly, useless.
It's all moot anyway, since the documents he *did* provide show an
immature system that comes nowhere near the claims he made in 1997.
There is nothing that could be added to that basic design that would
magically enhance it to come close to conventional DCT- or wavelet-
based systems. His colorspace model is RGB; his compression is based
on simple pixel-to-pixel deltas and runs. That is essentially the
Autodesk Animator FLI/FLIC format upgraded to 24-bit color.
http://www.adamsplatform.com.au/Documents/Supporting_Documents/Press_...http://www.adamsplatform.com.au/Documents/Supporting_Documents/Press%...
This information can be false or true or half true/half false.
No, it can be either true or false. See above.
the successful recorded demonstrations alone
outnumbered this percentage.
At no point was his system scientifically tested. Tolly made a huge
blunder by not inspecting the contents of the provided machines, and
when they realized that, they pulled the report.
is for me not a proof there is no way
to store a huge amount of values in this space
Your wording "there is no way" suggests that you have already made a
faith-based decision on the laws of the universe, hence no rational
argument will convince you otherwise. Since this newsgroup is for the
discussion of compression that *does* take place within the known laws
of the universe, please take your infinite compression discussions
elsewhere. There are many free energy and perpetual motion newsgroups
that would be happy to have you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggest any topic..
- From: Sportman
- Re: Suggest any topic..
- References:
- Re: Suggest any topic..
- From: Jim Leonard
- Re: Suggest any topic..
- From: Sportman
- Re: Suggest any topic..
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggest any topic..
- Next by Date: Re: Suggest any topic..
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggest any topic..
- Next by thread: Re: Suggest any topic..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading