Re: Suggest any topic..



On Dec 1, 4:31 pm, Jim Leonard <MobyGa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why do you go out of your way to specifically promote or endorse known
crackpots who don't follow the scientific method or perform proper
research?  Are you fundamentally unable to separate fact from fiction,
research from agenda?  Or do you simply believe everything you are
told?
Thank you for the video link I liked it a lot.
It remembers me this video (part 1-9) what give after watching all
parts a big surprise in the last minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpeIs5MFTYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDL1ugE7Tfw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RXrKRuNvNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU5YyolUHAw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZfHLxWfCLQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivU7WObCFzs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Bhpfy-4mws

Maybe it shall surprise you but I was from young age already a skeptic
science minded person and I started debunking somewhere round age of
5. The last 15 years it’s even part of my job to trace fake and with
success.

This skeptic of I shall proof it can’t be true lead me to some
surprising discoveries that some subjects I researched where much more
true then false while there is no plausible scientific explanation and
neater I could find one myself.

When I see something unfair I try to balance the case as I do here in
this newsgroup by basically saying some of that unbelievable
compression claims can be very well true. I’m not related with any
inventor or invention in this field but feel it unfair they are not
taken serious while the research I did, speak often more for them then
against them.

Let take as Adam Clark as example and then only the claim he made that
the Patent records issued by the United States Patent and Trademark
Office where inaccurate and incomplete and that the US States
Government or at least it’s Patent & Trademark Office refused to
publish as required at law the full invention of Mr. Clarks work.

http://www.adamsplatform.com.au/Documents/Supporting_Documents/Press_Release.pdf
http://www.adamsplatform.com.au/Documents/Supporting_Documents/Press%20Release%20No%202%2012th%20November%202008.pdf

This information can be false or true or half true/half false. If it’s
false it has no value, if it’s true it can explain why his patents
don’t show his magic algorithm, if it’s half true/half false it can
have value or no value.

None of this three options lead directly to 100% true. This claim of
Adam what can’t be verified as right and also not as wrong can be
ignored but I prefer to add it to a long list of events since he
started with his extra ordinary compression claims.

This list shows me a curve of events mostly consistent with his claims
but still no 100% guarantee it’s all true. Again it can be ignored
but I prefer to add it to a list of stories from other inventors with
this type of claims.

This list shows me again a curve of events mostly very similar to each
other but still no 100% guarantee Adam story or any other story is
true. Again it can be ignored but I prefer to ask the question how
likely is it they all didn’t tell the true? For me this chance is very
unlikely because I could only find in a little percentage possible
fraudulent events while the successful recorded demonstrations alone
outnumbered this percentage.

That the counting argument say there fit only 1,8e+308 eggs in a box
of 1,8e+308 eggs (1,024 bytes) is for me not a proof there is no way
to store a huge amount of values in this space where the best
conventional compressor need 1,048,576 bytes to store this same values.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: arc in a closed tube loop
    ... | patent infringement cases. ... You're an engineer, or so it seems. ... Though it is complex because of the way lawyers make it so. ... He just needs to understand whether a given "invention" ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)
  • Re: Alternative to Invention Patents
    ... On payment of this fee, ... If the product passed these tests, the creator ... you a specific example of an invention for you to explain. ... I recently applied for a US patent on the ...
    (sci.econ)
  • RE: Patent #6886160
    ... the most favorable tool. ... copyright to foster progress - the monopoly reward is just a means. ... NOT do that today - a patent is not a license to make money; ... They go hand in hand in my invention, IMHO, and they go hand in ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: Microsoft patents emoticons!
    ... not understand how to read patents: Every patent has to do two fundamental ... person of ordinary skill (in whatever field the invention is in) can make ... selecting pixels to be used as an emoticon; ... assigning a character sequence to the pixels; ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.apps)
  • Re: Constructive Laziness (Re: Stirlings _The Sunrise Lands_ and misc thoughts)
    ... domestication of the horse to the invention of the stirrup? ... Why did nobody come up with the wheelbarrow before Song China? ... of invention as a deliberate process, but rather saw each invention as a ... Stirling says that the world of mind is altered so the scientific method ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)