Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- From: jacko <jackokring@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 24, 11:21 pm, Thomas Richter <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jacko schrieb:
As the counting argument is not correct because...
I think we better stop this here. EOT.
Ok your loss. Assume compression works like this , blah, blah, cos
counting says it can't work like this then even working like that is
so bad... I mean how would we ever make any money?
Over and out.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- From: jacko
- Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- From: jacko
- Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- From: Thomas Richter
- Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggest a lossless highly efficient RLE library
- Next by Date: defragmented gzip
- Previous by thread: Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- Next by thread: Re: Continuation of open DISCUSSION between jacko et al
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|