Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: Stefano Brocchi <stefano.brocchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 18, 12:04 pm, danilobrambi...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
(r + 2g + b) / 4 -> y
b - y -> cb
r - y -> cr
Hi,
consider that you will have to use an extra bit to the y channel to
make the transform completely reversible, otherwise you could lose a
bit in the g channel. For example (r=0, g=0, b=0) and (r=0, g=1, b=0)
both map to (0,0,0): in one of the two cases when reversing the
transform a value will be worng.
So long,
Stefano
.
- References:
- Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: danilobrambilla
- Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: smithxjohn
- Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- From: danilobrambilla
- Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- Prev by Date: Re: answers please...
- Next by Date: Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- Next by thread: Re: Why channel decorrelation can improve compression?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|