Re: compression - insights into infinite

On May 29, 3:11 pm, jules Gilbert <jules.sto...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not sure you'll understand this, but here goes. I do not claim
that I can compress everything down to one bit, but I have a method,
wherein, without making use of any external parameters or hidden
dataset, I certainly can compress, and assuming the original input
file is large enough, many, many times, even thousands! of times.

How small? Given the current machine architectures all of use, wrt
the current hardware and software, I suppose that my method might be
used to drop a file down to one byte.

Might be? In other words, you haven't built ***? Some idea you're
trying to "decode" from your photographic memory?

And yes, I am referring to lossless compression and decompression.
One byte. And I've been a programmer since 1965, my first machine was
an IBM 1620-II running Fortran 2-D. (I learned and coded in SPS-II,
it's assembly language.)

I may someday show what I have, not publicly (a few of my friends
already know the method I am referring to.) But if I were to give a
public demonstration I might not be able to keep people such as
yourself from watching my program demonstration. Can I make this any
clearer?

You showed what you got in 1996, what happened?

Moreover, I have applied this process repetitively and see!! that the
process works.

Yet you don't know for certain if it'll reduce the RAD to one byte or
more. If you actually built the codec, and tested it on various inputs
of different sizes/content then you would know what your average
result output size was. Instead you withdraw to some vague corner of
triviality. Way to show a dead giveaway there.

Two problems remain;

1) Connecting these buffers to a suitable compressor.

A senior pr0grammer since 1965 no build a suitable codec? Thats
unpossible!!
.