comp.compression
- Re: Help with WFC Implementation
- From: biject
- Re: DEFLATE block size algorithms
- From: Errol Smith
- Re: 64bit gzip and 32bit gzip interoperability
- From: Mark Adler
- Help with WFC Implementation
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: 64bit gzip and 32bit gzip interoperability
- From: cr88192
- 64bit gzip and 32bit gzip interoperability
- From: Ron
- Re: compression challenge
- From: Einstein
- Re: compression challenge
- From: Mark Adler
- compression challenge
- From: mriedijk
- Re: DEFLATE block size algorithms
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: DEFLATE block size algorithms
- From: Einstein
- DEFLATE block size algorithms
- From: jdgrii8338
- Re: Combining features of JPEG-LS (Pre-Proc Filter) with LZ-77 ?????
- From: cr88192
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: cr88192
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: cr88192
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Thomas
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Thomas
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: biject
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: danilobrambilla
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: LiloLilo
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: Jean-Pierre Vial
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Mark Nelson
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Einstein
- Correct implementation of RGB channel decorrelation
- From: LiloLilo
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: George Johnson
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: George Johnson
- Re: Combining features of JPEG-LS (Pre-Proc Filter) with LZ-77 ?????
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Willem
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: biject
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: inconnu
- Combining features of JPEG-LS (Pre-Proc Filter) with LZ-77 ?????
- From: MH
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: George Johnson
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Mark Nelson
- Re: Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Thomas Richter
- Effective Lossy Compression of Bitstream
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Einstein
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Matt Mahoney
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: biject
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Microsoft HD Photo on Nokia & Sony Ericsson phones
- From: Thomas Richter
- Microsoft HD Photo on Nokia & Sony Ericsson phones
- From: Tea Vui Huang
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Nyang A. Phra
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Nicolas
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Einstein
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Willem
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Nyang A. Phra
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Einstein
- Re: Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Succint prefix-free code for integers?
- From: Nyang A. Phra
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: biject
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Einstein
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Einstein
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: biject
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: inconnu
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: biject
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: Fibonacci Code
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: Fibonacci Code
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: biject
- Re: Unary Representation
- From: biject
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Mark Nelson
- Unary Representation
- From: Fibonacci Code
- Re: Finding H.264 specification
- From: Thomas Richter
- Finding H.264 specification
- From: kalpesh
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: partner50145703
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: Cirroc
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Industrial One
- Re: DDSM image conversion
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: biject
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Jim Leonard
- Re: Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Jim Leonard
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Pete Fraser
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: LR
- Best existing binary compressor method?
- From: Einstein
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: Einstein
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: partner50145703
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: partner50145703
- Re: Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: Thomas Richter
- Magic Compression? (Why won't this work) (Code provided)
- From: partner50145703
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Einstein
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Providence
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- HPCNCS-08 Draft paper submission deadline is just few days from now
- From: john
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- DDSM image conversion
- From: Harris
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: JPEG variable quantization extension?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- Re: A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Einstein
- A request for samples to work with.
- From: Einstein
- Re: Strange? Entropy after BWT + RLE
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: Strange? Entropy after BWT + RLE
- From: biject
- Re: Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Thomas Pornin
- Seeking into a deflated stream
- From: Thomas
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Mark Adler
- Strange? Entropy after BWT + RLE
- From: Arsène Lupin
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Mark Adler
- What portion of all possible outputs are 50:50
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: whygee
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- JPEG variable quantization extension?
- From: Pete Fraser
- Re: LZ77
- From: Pasi Ojala
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: spamtrap
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: spamtrap
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: danilobrambilla
- Re: New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: LiloLilo
- New lossless image compression algorithm
- From: Stefano Brocchi
- Re: Found data transform algorithm to fit N bit length to X where X<=N
- From: biject
- Re: Found data transform algorithm to fit N bit length to X where X<=N
- From: Stefano B
- Re: Found data transform algorithm to fit N bit length to X where X<=N
- From: Arsène Lupin
- LZ77
- From: --luca--
- Found data transform algorithm to fit N bit length to X where X<=N
- From: Fibonacci Code
- Re: Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: Matt Mahoney
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: LiloLilo
- Re: Choose the best Rice index
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: Matt Mahoney
- Enhancement of the 3R algorithm
- From: whygee
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Industrial One
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Ross Ridge
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Steven Pigeon
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Industrial One
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Gurjant
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Chris Giese
- Choose the best Rice index
- From: danilobrambilla
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Industrial One
- 4 BITS RLE IN BMP
- From: Gurjant
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Industrial_One
- Re: The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- Re: The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: Sportman
- Re: Image compression Benchmark - Results
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: earlcolby . pottinger
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Le Chaud Lapin
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Industrial One
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Spam killing in GoogleNews
- From: Le Chaud Lapin
- Re: The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: Scott
- Re: The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: Jim Leonard
- The Tolly Group independent tested MatrixView SWISH
- From: Sportman
- Re: New LZW variant
- From: cr88192
- Re: New LZW variant
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich