Re: Repeatable compression is possible and easy to do, here's how...

Providence <psionic81@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
it seems you're really into personally attacking people on these
boards without any actual research of your own.. so, i'll be patient
until you implode.

Anyone who comes in here so utterly ignorant of information theory
and compression, and making outragious false claims, is a target
to be attacked. Such intellectual laziness should be stamped on.

That's you, that is.

How much compression do you think you would be achieving for these
463 bit files? Something significant like 10%, or something
less significant like 1% (4 or 5 bits, say)?

Actually, you hint at an answer to that in the following:

i do actually.. funny that huh, an example of what i'm talking about
being referenced inside the actual message.

You give no explicit answer though, not here or below.

An inability to answer a simple question is the hallmark of a crank
or a simple idiot - which are you?

if you can imagine this you're set: 5000bits long already. looking for
30% compression. per test each file is either compressed 30% or
expanded 30%, the distribution is 50%:50%. 5001 bits nope. 5002 bits
nope. 5003 bits nope. 5004 bits yep. success.. 5004 bits to 3503 bits.
recomposition microcode parameters 300 bits long. 300 bits + 3503 =
3803 bits. saving 201 bits total. Add another block of information
from the stream to get > 5000 bits to get ratio back.

My god, you're a complete freaking loon.

oh there it is.. so lets see here, i'm not talking about 'me' at all,
i'm talking about streaming compression algorithms.

No. You're talking bull***. I'm talking to someone spouting bull***,
and telling him he's spouting bull***. I wouldn't expect you to
understand that though, as I'm guessing your idiocy runs deep.

Your technique is likely to turn a 5000-bit file into a file so large
that it wouldn't fit onto all the hard disks ever manufactured.

actually dude, i've said that only 50% of all 5000 bit files will be
turned into resultant files that have 30% less bits in them.

You are a complete idiot. The above is mathematically impossible.
Not just improbable, but impossible. You are completely unaware
of the Kraft inequality.

Now go and learn something before you post more of your drivel
to comp.compression.

Phil
--
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
-- Microsoft voice recognition live demonstration
.