Re: Repeatable compression is possible and easy to do, here's how...

Phil Carmody schrieb:

I prefer to just work with ideals in in the ring Z[x]/(x^2+1).

You mean, R[x]/(x^2+1), I suppose? (-:

Not an "imaginary" number to be seen in either formulation.

That's what I say. Actually, "two" is not less "imaginary" than "i".
Both are human fiction.

So long,
Thomas
.