Re: compressing short XML messages without including dictionary or huffman table
- From: collection60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:33:40 -0700
1. I am looking for advice on a general approach to compressing short
messages, to be transmitted without dictionary/table overhead.
I'm no expert, by far... but just a guess... perhaps use the deflate
algorithm, on it's -9 setting. It's a good start.
If your XML was of a specific vocabulary, let's say it was svg files
you were transmitting, you could refer to a specific svg dictionary
for compression. :) Of course, if your XML files are of many different
vocabs.... I don't think this will help you.
I don't understand the sudden large steps up and down in compressed
sizes.
An inefficient algorithm, simply. The code to detect patterns is sub
optimal. It loses patterns and misses them due to limitations of the
code.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: compressing short XML messages without including dictionary or huffman table
- Next by Date: Re: OT: RFC, PRNG
- Previous by thread: Re: compressing short XML messages without including dictionary or huffman table
- Next by thread: Re: compressing short XML messages without including dictionary or huffman table
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|