Re: jacko
- From: jacko <jackokring@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 08:08:57 -0700
<snip>
Sup Jacko, I didn't slander you, you can thank those mouth-breathers
for that. I just want to engage in a civilized discussion about your
codec, if that's an option.
See the first page, how does "modulation" a.k.a making the file 50%
larger help make it more compressible? What techniques do you use
after modulation? If the file is random-appearing that has almost as
many 0 bits as 1 bits, then what bias does it possess? What is the
"bias" in that sort of data and how do you manipulate it to achieve
compression?
Modulation is an in situ process, the current carrier bit is modulated
(0->1) within any carrier bit interval, and the "other" bits of the
modulation, are prepended to the information to compress.
The carrier is then moved forward one bit, and futher modulation may
be possible, possibly even using the prepended bits from the last
carrier bit cycle.
so the expansion happens in the data to be compressed input buffer,
which is absorbed if the carrier has more than two zero bits for every
one bit.
is this any clearer?
i never said you slandered me, but was just generally replying to the
whole post.
cheers
jacko
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Compressing List of Tuples
- Next by Date: Re: Compressing List of Tuples
- Previous by thread: Re: jacko
- Next by thread: Re: jacko
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
