Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: erpy <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:46:30 +0200
Sportman ha scritto:
On Apr 24, 1:58 am, erpy <i...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suppose common compressors (Zip, Rar) would not compress the file thatI get this:
much (each byte only occurs 256 times throughout the file, with equal
probability in each string, so LZW-like compressors shouldn't achieve a
high ratio, in theory). I will convert it in bytes and run these tests.
Input:
65,536 bytes
Output:
Dark default = 66,666 bytes
ZIP max = 65,662 bytes
RAR max = 65,609 bytes
SBC -m3 = 65,589 bytes
GZIP default = 65,574 bytes
Durilca default = 63,028 bytes
PPMonstr default = 62,873 bytes
PAQ8L -2 or -3 = 61,591 bytes
Thanks Sportman, very interesting results indeed.
Impressive compressors those 3 that managed to take off up to ~4 Kb, considering they're "universal".
Best,
E.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: Josiah Carlson
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- References:
- Compression test on permutations
- From: erpy
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: Josiah Carlson
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: Mark Adler
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: erpy
- Re: Compression test on permutations
- From: Sportman
- Compression test on permutations
- Prev by Date: dicom with embedded jpegls
- Next by Date: Re: Compression test on permutations
- Previous by thread: Re: Compression test on permutations
- Next by thread: Re: Compression test on permutations
- Index(es):