Re: jacko

<industrial_one@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172186273.770152.166610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Feb 22, 3:02 pm, Willem <wil...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > industrial_...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
| >
| > What I meant to ask was, what is the chance of the output of
| > *any* compressor (such as WinZIP), or even an encryptor, being RAD ?
| >
| > Here's a hint: for a good compressor, or a good encryptor, each
possible
| > output is equally likely.
|
| For WinZIP, it's not very likely because it can usually be compressed
| again by 1% and even then the output is still not "truly random-
| appearing." WinRAR is a little better, and finally 7Z almost always
| does the trick. SO with WinZIP i'd say 10% chance. For an encryptor: I
| think the chance is 100% as long as it's recursive. If the output
| isn't RAD enough it can do another pass.
|
| For a codec that can compress RAD, nobody wrote one yet so we don't
| know. I'd say 50% but again, I have no background on this so I don't
| know. Maybe we can ask Jacko since he's the expert on this.

Blah blah blah...
Nobody cares.
You publically suicided in this newsgroup and only I am bothering with
you now.

I do this for my amusement alone.
I could give "Effective Trolling Tips", but with a snore-inducing
infantile bore like yourself, MEH!

You're not even worth the effort to mock aggressively.
There is so much lacking from your education and personality I might as
well be taunting an oyster.

"I just didn't care about passing math", oh that was on the level of,
"Hymietown" levels of rhetorical suicide in here.


.