Re: jacko
- From: "guenther vonKnakspott" <apacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Feb 2007 14:03:02 -0800
On Feb 22, 8:50 pm, industrial_...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I probably should. You are proving to be too stupid as to beWell, a sheep would certainly not bother with a twerp like yourself at
all, so it must definitely be smarter than me.
Exactly, so do us a favor and GTFO this thread.
entertaining for more than a few posts.
I've looked and I've looked again. All that you've spewed so far looksI never dismissed your claims on the grounds of your ignorance, and
much the less because of my personal beliefs, beliefs having no role
to play in these matters at all, but based on the mathematical proof
that the claims of the idiots you introduced yourself by trying to
suck up to are false. I only pointed out that your lack of
See above posts, what I provided there is *PROOF* that compressing
random data IS indeed possible. Pretty simple and logical, if you
still don't understand then continue with your Grade 3 math class cuz
I grow tired of educating a queer dimwad.
like crap and reeks of crap, and that is so because it happens to be
crap. Up to now you have failed to provide even a simple definition of
the crap you call RAD. As a matter of fact you have utterly failed at
demonstrating that you know the meaning of the word definition.
Besides you don't even know what you're talking about, let alone knowThat is no wonder, since no one at all knows what you are talking
what I'm talking about.
about. You are just raving like a lunatic off his meds.
I have not a single time called you a dumbass, you imbecile moron. Youmathematical understanding prevents you from understanding why those
claims are utter nonsense. As I told you before, the question is
whether you are stupid, and thus doomed to remain in that sorry
condition, or just ignorant, a shortcoming which you can overcome by
a bit of effort. It is up to you.
So far you've repeatedly called me a dumbass, care to backup your
statement with some facts by addressing my exact claims and how
exactly I have used wrong logic?
also have made no claims at all. You first need to learn the
difference between crapping all over the place and making claims,
whether true or false.
The phrase was "some gibberish on something you call RAD by some kookArently you also need to learn to read, since I never claimed that
the idiot Jackson "called it RAD". What part of the phrase "something
you call RAD" are you having difficulties with?
"you call RAD by some kook called Jackson."
called Jackson". Since your feeble intellect is evidently challenged
by any concatenation of more than three words I will try to explain it
to you. The gibberish is by the kook called Jackson, and the gibberish
is about something that you call RAD. Perhaps the confusion arises
from the fact that both you and Jackson are certifiable imbeciles.
I'm going to try once more. Your url was not a definition. In the bestlogic in your last posts so far? As of now you have stated nothing
that could be discussed at all, much less be disproved, what the heck
are you talking about?
In that case you are deluded and only believe what you wanna believe.
I can't help ya there, bud.
In the best of cases, a url to a file is something that people around
here call a reference, a definition being something seemingly outside
the reach of your feeble intellectual grasp. In this particular case
it is not even that.
*slaps head* Let's give you instructions like we would a 3-year-old:
select the url, right click and press copy, then click on your
browser, press Ctrl+V to paste the url, press enter, you will be
forwarded to a site with a download button, click it, you will get
a .RAR with 5 files inside whose contents consist of RAD. There's your
solid definition, you kept asking other guys "post the code and prove
it and quit yapping" so I simply posted the code to prove my point so
I don't have to yap. Maybe I misunderstood you -- you want me to waste
of cases it would have been a reference to a definition, but it only
was a reference to a bunch of worthless files. Now I will provide you
with a reference to the definition of the word definition according to
Merriam-Websters Dictionary. Be smart and try to learn something...
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/definition
my life some more with a 40-year-old ****** highschool-dropout
trying to explain him basic logic? That would be beyond my will, dude,
sorry.
.
- References: