Re: FAQ Maintenance?

Mark Adler wrote:
John McCarten wrote:
What's useful is when both the realizable and unrealizeable are
thoroughly documented and explained.

Of course -- that's expected and necessary. The current FAQ has the
counting argument. That's not what Matt was talking about putting in
the FAQ. Matt was talking about stuff that's just plain wrong
presented as if it were some sort of plausible side of an argument, in
order to be "fair".

OK. Although I didn't get this from his post, what you say is fair
comment.

john,

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: FAQ Maintenance?
    ... The current FAQ has the ... counting argument. ... Matt was talking about stuff that's just plain wrong ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: An interview question.
    ... Matt wrote: ... One of the popular compression algorithm is based on this ... if the pattern is repeated, writes out the index of the ... C++ Faq: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: On-Going Task
    ... See http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc for my free Project Tutorials ... Welcome to this Microsoft Project newsgroup :-) ... Please see FAQ Item: 19. ... "Matt D" wrote in message ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: On-Going Task
    ... Please see FAQ Item: 19. ... companion products and other useful Project information can be seen at this web address: http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm ... "Matt D" wrote in message ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: comp.lang.javascript Cookbook Proposal
    ... My point with choosing Richard, Matt and the subject was that you will ... The FAQ can stand for the moment. ... much like a restricted wikki. ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
Loading