Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
Phil wrote:
) Which is precisely why it's a bad idea, IMHO. I trust JLG to maintain
) it - I trust MM to maintain it. I'd trust you to maintain it, but I
) sure as heck wouldn't trust "anyone who cares to register". Prevention
) of abuse is far better than the ability to simply cure it /post facto/.
I'll give a specific (hypothetical) example of what would happen:
Somebody will alter the 'counting theorem' entry to say that it is only
a theory that has never been satisfactorily proven, or that it can be
circumvented by such-and-such method, entries will apear about several
infinite compression schemes, and so on.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: jacko
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- References:
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: Jim Leonard
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: markn@xxxxxxxx
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- Prev by Date: Re: New large block BWT compressor
- Next by Date: Re: OverZip boosts compression of WinRAR and WinUHA
- Previous by thread: Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- Next by thread: Re: FAQ Maintenance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|