Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: "Einstein" <michaelhh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Apr 2006 21:43:36 -0700
Ok, I challenge you Earl Colby Pottinger then. I will educate you all
in my method... in full.. You just have to agree to do it. In the end I
will be hearing much ado about apologies and the likes, so it will be
worth the time just for that.
First step is easy... If statistically all 3 bit type options are
exactly the same in a given string, then does the result of 1 have a
40% chance of occurence and 0 have a 60% chance with the following
conversion table:
111 = 11
110 = 101
101 = 011
011 = 100
100 = 010
010 = 001
001 = 0001
000 = 0000
And is it possible to go backwards given this string?
Reply to this to get further educated.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: sillybanter
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: markn@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: Earl Colby Pottinger
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- References:
- Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: Tjackson.1982@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: Tjackson.1982@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- From: Earl Colby Pottinger
- Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- Prev by Date: Re: New Compression Method
- Next by Date: Re: New Compression Method
- Previous by thread: Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- Next by thread: Re: Semi-new Compression Method Fully Implemented
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|