Re: question about QI coder
- From: "cp" <cp@xxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:48:17 +0100
hi !
thank you for your honest answers :
QI index is computed using only 506 adds of 32 bit numbers into the
output index
Hence the advantage of QI vs the exact
enumeration is not in output size but in speed and binomial table size.
QI reduces the arithmetic complexity and table sizes of exact enumeration
by a factor n/g
I thought it was going to make me "win" a few bytes ; however the
speed is also important !
bye
cp
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: question about QI coder
- From: nightlight
- Re: question about QI coder
- References:
- question about QI coder
- From: cp
- Re: question about QI coder
- From: nightlight
- question about QI coder
- Prev by Date: Re: Which of these is best?
- Next by Date: Re: Which of these is best?
- Previous by thread: Re: question about QI coder
- Next by thread: Re: question about QI coder
- Index(es):