Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- From: "Sachin Garg" <schngrg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Dec 2005 02:52:30 -0800
dalek_no2@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Another crackpot thought pattern from me. I occasionally poke my head
> into this group and rattle off some inane, but unusual thought
> regarding compression methods. I understand the basic concepts of
> compression, and I get the whole "you can't get something for nothing"
> line of reasoning, but I still like thinking towards the more exotic
> forms of data compression.
>
> Anyway, recently, I found myself reasoning thusly:
>
> It is possible, nay trivial, to create redundancy data for any file
> which will detect and correct any error up to the size of the
> redundancy data. Simple, yes?
>
> Why, therefore, would it be impossible to take a file, create just over
> 50% redundancy for it, delete the original file, create a -completely
> random- file of exactly the same size, and apply the recovery data to
> the random file? Statistically, only about half of the bits should be
> wrong. Also, you're not compressing N-bytes into fewer than N-bytes,
> since the random file is N-bytes, and the recovery data is 1/2 * N
> bytes.
>
> I suspect that my misunderstanding here lies in my understanding of
> error detection and recovery, but I just wanted to make sure.
Instead of speculating over if it will work or not, why not just code
it and see if it works :-)
Its not that hard to code this thing, and you will then know for sure.
Sachin Garg [India]
http://www.sachingarg.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- From: dalek_no2
- I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Prev by Date: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Next by Date: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Previous by thread: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Next by thread: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|