Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- From: "Jim Leonard" <MobyGamer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Dec 2005 23:10:42 -0800
dalek_no2@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Why, therefore, would it be impossible to take a file, create just over
> 50% redundancy for it, delete the original file, create a -completely
> random- file of exactly the same size, and apply the recovery data to
> the random file?
Simple: Because you only created 50% redundancy for it. If you
created 100% redundancy, it would work. But only 50% means that the
other 50% would still be random data.
Most parity-generation tools generate a managable amount of parity
information; RAR defaults to 1% (to handle small errors); or you could
use PAR to generate large amounts of parity that would recover one or
more chunks of a multi-part file. But it doesn't work miracles :-)
.
- References:
- I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- From: dalek_no2
- I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Prev by Date: embarrassing question on lzo decompression buffer corruption error
- Next by Date: Re: Arithmetic coder input
- Previous by thread: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Next by thread: Re: I know this won't work, I just want to know -why-.
- Index(es):