Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- From: Thomas Richter <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Dec 2005 13:45:25 GMT
Hi,
> I know that, it's just a question of semantics. I know that what
> everyone knows as a "JPEG" image is actually a JFIF. I should have made
> a point of being more accurate in my wording.
> I'm comparing an image saved as a standard (JFIF) JPEG, and the exact
> same image saved as a TIFF using JPEG compression. At the same visual
> quality level, the TIFF is still HUGE compared to the JPEG/JFIF. The
> TIFF is anywhere from 3 to 5 times as large as the JPEG/JFIF.
In that case, your TIFF creation program does something strange.
A JPEG in a TIFF container should be approximately the same size
as a JPEG in a JFIF container. Probably it stores an uncompressed/
raw version of the image along with the JPEG compressed version in the
same container.
So long,
Thomas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- From: Arne Demmers
- Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- References:
- JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- From: cypherswipe
- Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- From: Thomas Richter
- Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- From: cypherswipe
- JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- Prev by Date: Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- Next by Date: Re: Question about mmap wrt compressed files
- Previous by thread: Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- Next by thread: Re: JPEG compression in a TIFF file, pointless?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|