Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: "megagurka" <megagurka@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Sep 2005 04:11:00 -0700
Jim Leonard skrev:
> Not on modern platforms; for example, the most recent generation of
> Intel and AMD processors can perform more than one
> multiply/divide/modulo operations *per cycle* due to multiple
> pipelines. So there is no penalty if that is your target platform.
Not true for integer math on a Pentium 4 where, according to a simple
benchmark test, imul is at least 10x faster than idiv.
/JN
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: Jim Leonard
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- References:
- largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: cr88192
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: Matt Mahoney
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: cr88192
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: Matt Mahoney
- Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- From: Jim Leonard
- largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- Prev by Date: Re: Random Data compression by value question.
- Next by Date: JPEG interlining
- Previous by thread: Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- Next by thread: Re: largely OT: a random-number generator and bzip2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|