Re: Syntax directed compilation
- From: Barry Kelly <barry.j.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:03:32 +0100
Barry Kelly wrote:
I recall, a long time back on this group, people pointing out that
languages supporting redefinable or user extensible grammars have
never taken off
Has there been research in this area that I've missed on my searches
(using 'syntax directed compilation' as my main phrase)?
Replying to my own post, because I've found some interesting related
work not previously mentioned:
http://www.chrisseaton.com/katahdin/
"Katahdin is a programming language where the syntax and semantics are
mutable at runtime."
[...]
"New constructs such as expressions and statements can be defined, or a
new language can be implemented from scratch. It is built as an
interpreter on the Mono implementation of the .NET framework. "
Public domain source is available from that site.
-- Barry
--
http://barrkel.blogspot.com/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Grammar for optional elements
- Next by Date: Re: Grammar for optional elements
- Previous by thread: Dominance frontier example in "Engineering a Compiler"
- Next by thread: Errory recovery in C++ ANTLR parser?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
