Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- From: Chris Smith <cdsmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:50:00 -0600
Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[...] whereas Pascal is well suited for such
an task, without a need for using any additional library.
The same for C++ or Java, these also are useless without additional
libraries, [...]
Huh? I'm trying to figure out where you're coming from here. Really,
really trying... and it's not coming to me. Did you really just claim
that Java has too FEW standard library routines, but Pascal is fine?
Again, I don't see a strong reason for making any particular choice in
the first place, when teaching compilers. There are lex/yacc-ish
products available for most popular languages, or students can implement
their own in any decent language. If students can't be bothered to
locate their own tools or translate algorithms to their own choice of
language, then they can ask an instructor what to use, and get some
advice.
--
Chris Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- References:
- Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- Prev by Date: Avoiding Branch Misprediction in Virtual Machine (VM) Portably
- Next by Date: Re: Avoiding Branch Misprediction in Virtual Machine (VM) Portably
- Previous by thread: Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- Next by thread: Re: choosing a teaching language, was Java compiler courses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|