Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Apr 2006 10:00:22 -0400
On 21 Apr 2006 23:49:01 -0400, Avatar wrote:
Any thoughts on these two stack architectures would be greatly
appreciated?
I used three stacks. One was roughly what you call execution
stack. Two others were for arguments and locals. These two were
switched. When a function was called, its result was expected on the
current stack, the arguments were pushed onto another stack. Upon a
call stacks were swapped.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- References:
- Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- From: Avatar
- Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- Prev by Date: Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- Next by Date: Re: understanding the intuition behind LL(k) parsers and LR(k) parsers
- Previous by thread: Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- Next by thread: Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|